Meta vs Google: Comparing HIPAA Compliance Capabilities for Health Technology Companies

In today's digital healthcare landscape, health technology companies face unique challenges when advertising on platforms like Meta and Google. HIPAA compliance requirements create significant obstacles for effective marketing, particularly when tracking campaign performance. With the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) increasing enforcement actions against digital marketing violations, health tech companies need clear guidance on how these major platforms handle protected health information (PHI).

The HIPAA Compliance Challenge in Health Technology Advertising

Health technology companies operate in a high-stakes compliance environment where marketing missteps can lead to serious consequences. When leveraging platforms like Meta and Google for advertising, three specific risks emerge:

1. Pixel-based tracking vulnerabilities: Both Meta and Google's standard tracking pixels collect IP addresses and device identifiers that may constitute PHI when combined with other data points. For health technology companies, this creates a direct compliance risk when tracking user interactions with health-related services.

2. Conversion event transmission issues: When users complete actions like appointment scheduling or health assessment tools, standard tracking methods may inadvertently capture condition-specific information, medication details, or demographic data that constitutes PHI.

3. Audience building complications: Meta's detailed targeting capabilities can inadvertently create protected class identifiers when combined with health tech engagement data, potentially exposing sensitive health information in violation of HIPAA.

The OCR has explicitly addressed these concerns in their 2022 guidance on tracking technologies, stating that "regulated entities are not permitted to use tracking technologies in a manner that would result in impermissible disclosures of PHI to tracking technology vendors or any other violations of the HIPAA Rules."

The fundamental difference between client-side and server-side tracking is critical for HIPAA compliance. Client-side tracking (standard pixels) captures data directly from the user's browser, including potentially sensitive information, before sending it to advertising platforms. Server-side tracking, on the other hand, allows for PHI filtering and sanitization before information reaches third-party platforms, creating a vital compliance barrier.

How Curve Solves HIPAA Compliance for Meta and Google Advertising

Curve provides health technology companies with a specialized solution that addresses the compliance gaps in both Meta and Google's advertising ecosystems. The platform's PHI stripping process works on two critical levels:

Client-Side Protection: Curve implements a customized tracking setup that identifies and removes potential PHI elements before they're captured by tracking mechanisms. This includes:

• IP address anonymization through redaction and hashing

• Device identifier sanitization

• Form field monitoring to prevent capture of health condition data

Server-Side Sanitization: Curve's server-side implementation creates a secure intermediary between your health technology platform and advertising networks by:

• Processing conversion events through Meta's Conversion API (CAPI) or Google's Enhanced Conversions with all PHI elements stripped

• Implementing parameter filtering to remove any potential health identifiers

• Creating a compliant data pipeline with signed Business Associate Agreements (BAAs)

For health technology companies, implementation follows these key steps:

1. Integration with existing health tech platform analytics through API connections

2. Configuration of data sanitization rules specific to health technology conversion points

3. Setup of server-side event processing with PHI filtering rules

4. Testing and validation to ensure no protected information reaches Meta or Google

HIPAA-Compliant Optimization Strategies for Health Technology Companies

While maintaining HIPAA compliance, health technology companies can still implement effective advertising strategies on Meta and Google. Here are three actionable approaches:

1. Implement modeled conversions tracking: Both Meta and Google offer modeled conversion options that rely less on individual-level data. Health technology companies can use Curve's compliant server-side implementation to feed sanitized conversion data into these systems, maintaining performance while eliminating PHI transmission.

2. Leverage lookalike audiences with sanitized seed data: When building lookalike audiences, ensure the seed audience data is fully sanitized of PHI. Curve's platform allows health technology companies to create effective lookalike audiences without compromising protected information by transmitting only compliant data points through Meta CAPI.

3. Utilize Google's Enhanced Conversions with PHI filtering: Google's Enhanced Conversions can dramatically improve performance, but require careful implementation for health technology companies. Curve's server-side implementation ensures that only HIPAA-compliant, non-PHI data points feed into Google's conversion system.

By implementing these strategies through Curve's HIPAA compliant tracking solution, health technology companies can achieve marketing effectiveness while maintaining regulatory compliance. Our PHI-free tracking approach ensures that you can still access the powerful optimization capabilities of both Meta and Google while eliminating compliance risk.

Take Your Health Technology Advertising to the Next Level

Ready to run compliant Google/Meta ads?
Book a HIPAA Strategy Session with Curve